Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

YTBG Talbingo

19 posts in this topic

Posted

I've put together a first cut of my first (hopefully OZx) airstrip: YTBG Talbingo, in the Snowy Mountains of southern NSW. I've sent Mark a link to the files.

The real airstrip is apparently closed now, though it seems to be still regularly used as an unofficial landing point for hang gliders, paragliders, gliders and ultralights - and perhaps for takeoff too by ultralights.

It's located about 100 km SW of Canberra, at alt 1320', between Blowering Reservoir and Talbingo Reservoir. Some pretty interesting terrain here.

1225533223.jpg

I've moved the strip a little bit from reality - it's now a couple of hundred metres further west, to fit in with the FTX town landclass (which would be covered by the eastern part of the strip if it were in its exact location), and the road, which is a bit further north than reality.

In reality the whole slope between the strip and the lake is treeless, but the FTX landclass is currently forest. I was thinking initially of trying to do PR for the whole section between the strip and the lake, but I'm concerned about trying to get a tight fit along the coastline and, since I've put in an issue report to Orbx, I figured it would be better to cover a minimal area and let the LC be updated independently.

The strip is curious in that it has a short (300m) and very narrow section of bitumen in the middle of a longer 04/22 grass strip.

1225537024.jpg

It also has a helo pad marking at one end of the bitumen. I didn't want to place static GA but I think it's sometimes used for glider landings.

1225545610.jpg

BTW I did the object placement with Whisplacer, just to check whether it worked - it's worked out reasonably well so far though I am having trouble using some of the libraries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Hi Matt,

We've had a bit of a look - very nice little strip.

A couple of little things to tweak .. and all will be very nice.

Just a question, are you running FSX-SP2 - because the fence mdl (an FSX generic one no less icon_rolleyes.gif ) has some transparency problems and will need to be replaced icon_rolleyes.gif

As you noted on the Orbx forums the shoreline and Landclass around this area is a little lacking - so we might have to see what can be done in that department.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Someone say Helipad? sweet!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Hi Matt,

We've had a bit of a look - very nice little strip.

A couple of little things to tweak .. and all will be very nice.

Just a question, are you running FSX-SP2 - because the fence mdl (an FSX generic one no less icon_rolleyes.gif ) has some transparency problems and will need to be replaced icon_rolleyes.gif

As you noted on the Orbx forums the shoreline and Landclass around this area is a little lacking - so we might have to see what can be done in that department.

Hi Ian,

I'm running Acceleration here. Was thinking the fence looked a bit jaggy but hadn't seen transparency probs in Accel. Thanks for the feedback - I'll change the fence.

Oh yes forgot to mention the shoreline. I did report the landclass to Orbx, but as you say the shoreline is pretty rough. Come of think of it, that's the main reason I didn't want to try to PR the surrounding area - in case the shoreline changed later.

I haven't done any flattens on the runway, so it's nice and bumpy, though this does seem a bit weird with bitumen. Don't have any non-distant photos of the bitumen section - only the grass further west. Goes with the sense of an officially-closed and unmaintained strip, I suppose, but if you think one or more flattens would be better, I'm happy to do that.

In the same vein I've made the buildings just little storage sheds rather than hangars or similar.

Any and all comments/suggestions/criticism welcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Matt I like em bumpy, even the bitumen ones (long as they are not OTT). kadina is bitumen and has a big rise in the middle, so much so that you cant see the other end of the runway, I thought it was odd at first, but a site visit confirmed that was exactly how it was in real life. Great effort mate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

As I said on the "new scenert" forum.

Get rid of all fences. They spoil the whole thing.

Lower both sheds. They are floating.

Apart from that it is a very pleasant strip and is just about ready for release.

But I query the placement of the heli-pad. Is it realy in that position?

I don't know any chopper pilot who would dare to use it. Let alone leave his machine parked on an active runway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

But I query the placement of the heli-pad. Is it realy in that position?

I don't know any chopper pilot who would dare to use it. Let alone leave his machine parked on an active runway.

Apparently it is .....

talbingocopy.jpg

You'll have to talk to the people who designed the airfield, Jack !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

What the Hell!! icon_evil.gif

Using the Real World to refute Jack?

Actually clicking on your Google Earth to check something?

Hardly fair!

lol.gif

I've had quite a few complaints about the touchdown pads at YBAF - from people too lazy to do their research - and complaints about trees too tall at YRIO when the real ones are taller and closer, "etc, etc and so on and so forth..."*

*Remembered very roughly from "The King and I"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Thanks for the kind words, fellas.

Good idea to remove the fences, Jack - makes things simpler.

Re the sheds appearing to float - curious, I don't see that here (with FSX Acceleration). I've lowered them a bit (30cm) now in the hope that that resolves it.

Re the helipad - quite right to raise it, Jack, it is a bizarre location. I can only think that the helipad marking was added after the strip was closed to GA. BTW it seems YTBG is now classed as an ALA (Aircraft Landing Area, previously known as Authorised Landing Area).

I've done a version 2 and given Mark the link. In it I've removed the fences, lowered the two sheds slightly, and added some soft shadowing to the PR at object locations to simulate ground shadows (e.g. under cars).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

That looks really nice, and anywhere that has camping is always welcome!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Wantok, can you PM the link to meatycus, kman, hrcornea, etc so one of them can link in the Dev section. I'm off to work, now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Thanks for the kind words' date=' fellas. Re the sheds appearing to float - curious, I don't see that here (with FSX Acceleration). I've lowered them a bit (30cm) now in the hope that that resolves it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

V2 is very good.

I think it passes scrutiny.

No one can blame you for the surrounding landclass

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yes Jerry - we are being picky buggers ... but we can't have FSX setting the standard! wink.gif

As Mark suggested - it only really matters for somehting that you can Taxi close to ... in this case, the sheds were perfect at the front - and a little floaty at the back - which is a really simple adjustment.

Overall - a very fine effort - and a proud addition to OzX I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

V2 is very good.

I think it passes scrutiny.

No one can blame you for the surrounding landclass

Cheers, Jack, much appreciated.

Overall - a very fine effort - and a proud addition to OzX I think.

Thanks, Ian!

Ideally we'll get the landclass revised by Orbx in their next round of LC revisions for Blue; if the shoreline can be improved (by Orbx? OZx?), all the better.

BTW there's a modelling challenge up for grabs nearby: just around the corner to the south is a massive hydro-electric station (Tumut 3, part of the Snowy Mountains scheme)... icon_e_smile.gif If anyone feels like taking it on, great, otherwise I'll take a look after I've done the next couple of strips.

tumut-3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It may cause a problem with scenery shadows though. I remember for FS9 I stuck an object a bit into the ground (it was a fence made of a treated pine log on a low post and I was trying to get a bit of variation in the row of logs by changing the height) and its shadow disappeared. This was a while ago so I could be completely mistaken in which case I apologise in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It may cause a problem with scenery shadows though. I remember for FS9 I stuck an object a bit into the ground (it was a fence made of a treated pine log on a low post and I was trying to get a bit of variation in the row of logs by changing the height) and its shadow disappeared. This was a while ago so I could be completely mistaken in which case I apologise in advance.

We don't recommend turning shadows on. Too many problems - like square shadows from masked non-square objects.

Hey Anthony, if you've started developing for FSX, could you keep us advised of what you have planned or even come on board here? As soon as your up-to-speed with the new tools, advances and limitations - you'll have a ball!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yes Mark

I've noticed that some of the trees cast nasty square shadows. I don't know whether these are the ORBX models or the default vegetation. I've also noticed that open hangars can cast some odd shadows.

It is possible though to modify the "Enhanced Parameters" of the model so it doesn't cast any shadows. Don't know if the GMAX plugin includes this option (having troubles getting GMAX to work with the FSX plugin) but it can be done by editing the .x file.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There is a material option in Gmax for No Shadow ... but I can't say I've used or tested it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0